Take a look... Opinions needed...

[Bruceswar]

I have a 1964 Dime that may be FT or FB whichever you want yo use... anyhow... take a look tell me if you think it is worth submitting to try for a Star or FB or both.. Thx... Oh Also if you agree with my grade from the pic... yes there is luster it did not show up in the pics...

 

[HaydenTubbs]

I'd call it a 65 FT possibly a 66.Nice coin!

[Bruceswar]

you think it warrants a star?

[HaydenTubbs]

It has nice toning but it doesn't appear that vibrant in the pics,so I'll say probably not on this one...

[Bruceswar]

here is the quarter from the same set..

[Die Varieties]

Very nice. I posted a dime on another thread that I had gotten slabbed with ANACS. It had toning on the obverse with white reverse. It received a 66 FSB and your coin looks to me to be around there -- so I will say 65, maybe 66 FSB. I don't think it would be a star.

[kryptonitecomics]

I like the toning and agree with FT.....but I'd give it a 5% chance of getting a star. Doesn't really matter though....it's still an attractive coin.

[MikeInFL]

Call me crazy, but I see rub on the lower part of the torch and on the obverse ear and hair. Beautiful coin, nonetheless...Mike

[BankNote1]

The dime needs to cook a little longer, IMO. Toss it up in the attic for a year or two!

[HaydenTubbs]

Call me crazy, but I see rub on the lower part of the torch and on the obverse ear and hair. Beautiful coin, nonetheless...Mike

Ok I'll call you crazy,

 

Seen any AU-58s in MS-70 holders lately???

[TomB]

It looks like an MS65 or MS66, but it doesn't look like it has the pop to get the star designation. It would go FB at PCGS and might go FT at NGC.

[coinman1794]

A nice looking dime. However, each close up shows a tiny tick breaking the verticle lines above the torch bands, and even those miniscule marks are enough to negate any chance at FT. Thats how tight the designation is. However, it is definitely an FB at PCGS. Very hard to say from the pics whether or not a star is possible.