VKurtB Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 On 9/4/2023 at 6:21 PM, EagleRJO said: Just tossing out a suggestion instead of joining the match. Are they not "proof" coins? Why not call a spade a spade considering the mint calls these sets with a special planchet and strike "proof sets", which may have changed over the years. No, no 1965-67 coins are proofs of any description. R__Rash 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EagleRJO Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 (edited) On 9/4/2023 at 7:26 PM, VKurtB said: No, no 1965-67 coins are proofs of any description. Uncirculated Set? Just throwing out terms the mint presently uses for these annual sets. Edited September 4, 2023 by EagleRJO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VKurtB Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 (edited) On 9/4/2023 at 6:29 PM, EagleRJO said: Uncirculated Set? Just throwing out terms the mint presently uses for these annual sets. 1965-1967 sets have no equal in any other time frame. Perhaps 2005-2010 comes closest, but no cigar. Edited September 4, 2023 by VKurtB R__Rash 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R__Rash Posted September 4, 2023 Share Posted September 4, 2023 On 9/4/2023 at 5:46 PM, VKurtB said: 1965-1967 sets have no equal in any other time frame. Having seen this can of worms opened more than once in the years I’ve been reading along, I believe your response is an excellent summary of all previous discussions combined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
