Moneybagg ko

On 3/6/2021 at 6:18 PM, RWB said:

The cent in the photo is dated 1918 or possibly 1915. The photo quality is too poor to be sure.

On 3/6/2021 at 6:18 PM, RWB said:

The cent in the photo is dated 1918 or possibly 1915. The photo quality is too poor to be sure.

Just now, Moneybagg ko said:

It not a fake it's hard to get it in pics because its worn but it says 43 no one on here th wakes the time to see that they automatically say that's not a 43 but it is it's just hard to get the pic when it's already worn 

It looks like it's been stamped twice because of how wide the date appears

On 3/7/2021 at 9:57 AM, Quintus Arrius said:

A genuine '43, or counterfeit?

It not a fake it's hard to get it in pics because its worn but it says 43 no one on here th wakes the time to see that they automatically say that's not a 43 but it is it's just hard to get the pic when it's already worn 

On 3/7/2021 at 9:57 AM, Quintus Arrius said:

A genuine '43, or counterfeit?

That's the best pics u can get with a phone it is a 4 it looks like a one in pics 

I found this in some change I had a few months back its copper not steel it does not stick to a magnet