durr3

5 hours ago, VKurtB said:

My personal opinion on "classic" gold, pre-1934, is that it is always better to have it graded, just for authentication. Buyers love to "low ball" offers on non-graded material. For modern gold, it is less important if original government packaging is involved. The "delta" on value per grade on modern and not so rare classic gold is quite small, unless you get into truly pristine coins - real "monster" condition.

ok thanks.  I had these tested for gold content and they all tested good.

8 minutes ago, durr3 said:

Are these good enough?  I have the reverse pics too.

2 hours ago, kbbpll said:

Posting clear, focused images (both sides) here would help. Lots of people could readily ID a counterfeit just from the images. There are just so many fakes of the Indians that it would be my first step before spending money on grading.

I will do just that.  Let me take some sharp pics and post them.  Thanks

8 minutes ago, JKK said:

So, supposedly, did the two counterfeits in the batch I just helped a lady liquidate.

Oh, my....I better have them tested.  Thanks

Thanks for the heads up, but these all came from a reputable dealer.  

Hello,

I have four NGC graded gold coins and nine raw gold coins.

How do you decide to send for grading or not?

(2) 2011 $50 Gold Eagles

1912 $10 Indian

1910 $5 Indian

1914 $2 1/2 Indian

1857 $1 Indian Princess

1982 UK Sovereign 1/4 oz

2017 UK Rooster 1/4 oz

1986 Canada Maple 1/10 oz

Thank you