Liz0911

22 minutes ago, Just Bob said:

I am not sure what "drippings" are seeing. I see a badly damaged cent.

Like an indentation of some sort of coin on top of Lincoln's face and the letters lightly spelled on the jacket and neck..And again excuse for the damaged coin.

I found this while searching through my coins..sorry for the pics..tried to make it as clear as I can..but if u notice when you zoom in face the drippings and the very lightly word "pluribus" if I'm not mistaken and pardon on the quality of the coin. Any teachings and/or opinions would be appreciated? Thank you Liz.

Can someone explain please..on the  One Cent?

And the columns on the reverse..they are doubled arent they?

I found this..this is a double die right? And is it worth submitting?

Here is another one. The year and description for it please? It looks old, like from the 70's.

Can someone help with this coin? The year and definition for it?

4 hours ago, Greenstang said:

The 1981, because you only show one side I can assume the reverse is normal is called a MAD (Misaligned Die), which is an error.

The 1998 has what looks like Linear Plating Bubbles which is a form of PMD.

Does the 998 in the year  of the 1998 look double to you? And are the plating bubbles done while it is struck or after? Trying to understand?

3 hours ago, Greenstang said:

The 1981, because you only show one side I can assume the reverse is normal is called a MAD (Misaligned Die), which is an error.

The 1998 has what looks like Linear Plating Bubbles which is a form of PMD.

Sorry I couldn't post the back earlier. This is a shot of back and front. Back in the word states the A seems flat not as bold as the other letters and also the .E. and P. The O in one cent also but u have to position it a certain way to see it. And thank you so much for your advice. It's straight forward and simple. Much appreciated. 

What are your thoughts on these?

5 hours ago, DWLange said:

Yes, that is the Close AM reverse.

Thank you but found out it's not worth the time..it's a 2001 and coins from 2000 and on all have the close AM on them.

Thank you

EM

25 minutes ago, Tridmn said:

Kind of looks ddr on bottom of coin unless my eyes deceive me.

I said the same thing

59 minutes ago, Just Bob said:

It appears to be. What is the date?

It is a 2001and also does it have the distance on signature to building if I'm not mistaken?

Is this what it means by "close AM"?

Is this considered a close AM?

2 hours ago, Greenstang said:

Agree-

Just damage and wear. Face value in that condition.

Thank you

3 hours ago, CRAWTOMATIC said:

That's a "wheel mark" caused by rolling machines used by the companies/banks that roll coins after they leave the Fed.  Would be considered post-mint damage (PMD).

Thank you

Thank you

1 hour ago, Greenstang said:

Nice looking 1956 Wheatie but it would cost way more to send in than what the value is. Put in a 2x2 and keep as a nice example.

Thank you

I also have this 1965 quarter..don't know if it was struck incorrectly or done intentionally..the "c" in America on the back also looks funny..can someone give some advice..highly appreciated.

Thank you Liz

I have this 1956 penny..would it be ok to send it in..does it look good??..Would appreciate feedback.

Thank you Liz