• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

v/d Merwe

Member
  • Posts

    7
  • Joined

Posts posted by v/d Merwe

  1. Hi missed you on the BOB forums. Agree that these sets look better in their mint issue cases ungraded. I am participating in the NGC registry sets hence me wants them graded. 
    I am not really bothered on potential upside in value having a higher graded coin BUT having a coin that’s graded right for its condition would be nice compared to what’s in the registry. If it raises the value it’s a bonus be it a very nice one.
    Apart from a few select years they are not high cost to purchase. Some sets will probably be cheaper than the grading fees on the set. Hobbies hey?
    I am a firm believer in buying the coin and not the holder. Seeing noticeable  marks on the obverse of Queen Elizabeth bust especially on the 5 Shillings in slabs up to PF 66. Then comparing to a PF63 and thinking NGC got the slabs mixed in grading. 
     

    05751E2C-818F-41CE-8ECB-C685EE4D937B.png

    8C34218D-2669-40AE-908E-F709ABC453B6.png

  2. Yes it’s mostly South African Union Proof coins. They are minted pre 1960. These proofs always look different in hand compared to pictures for various reasons as you all know. Especially if there’s toning. In hand there will be no hairlines even under magnifying for those that I decide to submit for grading. 
    Photo is for reference regarding Union proofs. 4112821C-7C02-4FC5-A58C-247AAA2D2129.thumb.png.f66a92bf3a832c2e07e5bfa9046661a9.png

  3. Happy new year fellow collectors.

    I have been submitting coins for grading to NGC since 2008 and have been getting higher grades on my submissions recently compared to older ones. In hand most of my older graded coins looks better than my more recent ones which been submitted in 2020. 
    I heard about grade inflation but didn’t give it much thought till I can compare with personal experience. 
    If cost is not a drawback is it not then worthwhile to resubmit and expect a higher grade?

    I see that NGC can be 3weeks + behind on some submissions and are recruiting new members of staff offering sign on bonuses. 
    Could it be inexperienced graders or rushing through invoices to blame? 
    The saying goes buy the coin and not the holder but when PF63/64/65 looks superior to recent PF67 graded ones I am beginning to be sceptical.