• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

RWB

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    21,268
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    215

Everything posted by RWB

  1. He means "on the die," producing the coin as shown.
  2. Nope. Also, excessively processed photo just makes it worse.
  3. Found a bank holiday era letter where the woman writing said the only cash she had were a souvenir Columbian half and quarter. She wanted to know if they were real money. There is a lot of quality in those old one-reelers. As a kid, my Dad and I would get up early on Sunday and watch L&H and other silents and talkies on TV. It was the only time they were shown - mostly as filler for otherwise dead air time.
  4. Observation suggests that Sesquicentennial quarter eagles seem to tone/tarnish more than other gold of 1926 --- or maybe that's just a biased sample....
  5. The coins incorrectly referred to as "1964 SMS" are nothing but very early strikes off new dies. Examples from the DM are in Smithsonian. They are a NORMAL part of the products from entirely NORMAL dies and NORMAL die use. They are NOT specially made as were the 1965-1967 Special Mint Set coins.
  6. The spot was caused by contamination after the coin was struck. Since it was removed from the Mint's original packaging, no one can determine where in the handling chain the contamination occurred. Each time a coin is removed from its packaging (plastic holder) the chances of contamination increase. The defect, once visible, cannot be corrected.
  7. Geee....that might help...after a few thousand photos, photomicrographs, SEM shots, or several hours of video, the coin might look like Marilyn Monroe.
  8. Correct. On re-reading, my comment above is confusing. (PS: We now have access to a group of US Mint letters and "show reports" from the 1893 Expo. They will soon be posted on the NNP and include transcriptions.)
  9. Reduction of tin to a "trace" began after May 1941 and continued until the formal change in 1962....not that anyone paid much attention. The bronze assay tables are being extracted from Mint documents for general information and to aid counterfeit detection via careful XRF measurements. Modern fakes of early bronze 1-cent and 2-cent pieces will likely have an incorrect alloy. Presently, I have bronze assays #1-11 for 1864. The planchets came from Waterbury, CT.
  10. There are no SMS 1964 coins. There were no SMS sets. The OP's coin is not one of the first coins off a new die pair for 1964.
  11. Also a main character in an old, old TV show about a place that almost never existed. :)
  12. Some find that using a very small - point source - light helps accentuate the effects of cleaning and surface alteration.
  13. Looks like strongly clashed dies, but not a dime restruck with cent dies.
  14. It's value is 50-cents. But....see Mark's comment.
  15. The Franklin half was bored out and a cut down Kennedy obverse inserted. Note the seam just outside the date/inscription on the Kennedy side. Novelty piece.
  16. No, but a nice looking 1817. A "master coin" of that era would be very sharply detailed, crisp denticles and a mirrored surface - although not as deep as a modern proof. There is considerable disagreement about the "proofyness" of some early master coins. Unfortunately, your coin would not be part of the discussion. Conder101's comments are spot on.
  17. OK. I'll do penance: I'll say three Hail Larrys, two Moes and one Curley.....and only pray for one new Mercedes-Bens.
  18. Wellllll -- no need to lose your lunch over it. (Hope you're not a pickled beets fan....)
  19. Sculptor Lee Laurie did a lot of "coaching" of John Sinnock before the final obverse and reverse were ready for reductions. [I have a detailed FDR dime article ready for publication. It's built on previously unknown letters, descriptions and photos.]