• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

PennyGuy

Member
  • Posts

    244
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Journal Entries posted by PennyGuy

  1. PennyGuy
    Assemble your own set, only 42 cents total face value.......
    My Two Cents Worth..
     
    The two cent piece occupies an interesting position among all US coins for the collector. With production beginning during a severe circulating coin shortage, it was initially well received,
    but as other denominations of coinage made their appearances, the two cent piece quickly fell out of favor.
    This short lived series offers the opportunity to collect in a number of ways. With a ten year circulation strike production span and a plentiful supply, the collector can opt to pursue
    completing a set in just about any grade they choose. While the higher grade examples can become quite costly, most collectors will find that quality extremely-fine to almost un-circulated examples are readily available at affordable prices. Collectors can choose to pursue high grade circulation strike or proof strike samples of the coins as well, but they should be aware that coins from the later years of the series can quickly become quite expensive. Thus as a short lived series, a year set can be completed much more easily than other longer term issue denominations.
    History buffs will relate to the two-cent piece beginning introduced during the U.S. Civil War, and the first use of the In God We Trust motto. The use of the Union Shield for the obverse of the two cent piece in 1864 and the five cent piece in 1866, firsts for American coinage, speak to the Federal governments resolve to preserve the Union.
    The series can offer error collectors a wide variety of issues to choose from. The Cherrypickers Guide details a total of twenty-one different error and varieties for this short series. Over thirty varieties and errors are documented for the year 1864 alone in Kevin Flynns book Getting Your Two Cents Worth.
    The two cent piece was first suggested in 1806 in legislation offered by Senator Uriah Tracy of Connecticut. His Bill suggested a silver composite 20 cent piece and a two cent piece of billon. After passage by the Senate, Mint Director Robert Patterson was successful in defeating the bill in the House of Representatives. Not to be deterred, Senator Tracy made another attempt in early 1807, however the influence of Director Patterson prevailed in the House of Representatives once again.
    In January of 1816 Representative Erastus Root of New York introduced legislation suggesting a two cent piece. Opposition from the Treasury Department and the Mint was enough to prevent passage of the Bill.
    Another attempt was mounted in 1836 with likewise negative results due to the opposition of then Mint Directory Robert M. Patterson, whose father, as Mint Director, had ended the earlier attempts. This effort was accompanied by several pattern coins struck in billon (90% copper/10% silver), and in copper. Surviving examples are identified as Judd 52 and Judd 54.
    In late 1862 and through 1863 the Mint was unable to meet demand for the new small copper-nickel cents due to wartime hoarding and the lack of a five cent piece in circulation to support commerce. In December 1863 Mint Director James Pollock suggested a 2 cent coin be produced, in bronze, in an attempt to supply much needed minor coinage for circulation.
    Patterns were ordered struck that have been identified as Judd 305, 306, 308, 312, and 312a. These patterns were produced in a variety of metals and designs. The bronze Judd 312 and 312a most closely resemble the design implemented in 1864. Treasury Secretary Chase requested that the motto of God Our Trust be changed to In God We Trust. Congressional approval was included in the Mint Act of 1864, approved by Congress on April 22, 1864.
    Disagreement exists about the first year mintage totals. Author R.W. Julians article All About The Two Cents, in the December 2009 issue of The Numismatist notes The correct mintage of 2-cent pieces in 1864 was 19,822,500, not the currently accepted figure of 25,000 more. He attributes the discrepancy to an error in 1886 when calendar year figures were calculated. Current Red Book editions report mintage as 19,847,500.
    Production began utilizing a pattern die that had the small lettering in the In God We Trust motto. The balance of 1864 production and all subsequent years used larger motto lettering as well as exhibiting other less noticeable changes. The proof production of this first year is estimated at 100 pieces, with about 20 known to be of the Small Motto variety.
    In his book The Two Cent Piece and Varieties, author Myron M. Kliman estimates that the survival rate of proof strike two cent pieces at sixtytwo and one half percent. This would mean that of the estimated 100 proof pieces produced in 1864, less the known Small Motto examples approximately 42 proof examples remain of the Large Motto. Thus any Proof production examples are highly prized.
    A total of 45,601,000 circulation strike, and 7,160 proof two cent pieces were minted between 1864 and 1873. Designed by James Barton Longacre the two cent piece met with initial popularity, but demand soon fell to the point that production was discontinued. The two cent piece was the first United States coin to bear the motto In God We Trust. With Longacre's death in 1869 a new Chief Engraver, William Barber, took over the Mint's design duties. Barber modified the Master Hub by reducing the size of the berries along with other small changes. The coins struck from 1870 to 1873 show these changes.
    As demand for the two cent piece waned circulation strike production was stopped in 1872. It has been accepted that in 1873 only 600 Proof issues were produced. These 600 pieces are known as the Closed 3 variety. We also know an additional 500 pieces were produced, at some point, that exhibit the Open 3 variety. In the R.W. Julian article he states:
    "The Open 3 coins of 1873 have long been assumed to be restrikes of the mid 1870s, but this is not likely. It was normal practice to stockpile proof coins in anticipation of demand, and there is reason to believe the Open 3 coins were, in fact, struck in March 1873 but never officially released. It seems probable that someone with access to these proof coins simply switched full-weight, uncirculated pieces for the Open 3 variety just before such coins were to be melted at years end.
    The Open 3/Closed 3 varietys, are seen on a number of other coins of 1873 as well. The gold Double Eagle, Half Eagle, Three Dollar, Quarter Eagle and One Dollar; along with the Quarter Dollar, Half Dime, Shield Nickel, Three Cent Nickel, and Indian Head Cent denominations all exhibit the Open 3/Closed 3 variety. All of these Open 3 varieties are accepted to have been produced in 1873 so the idea that the Open 3 variety two-cent pieces were also produced in 1873 would be consistent with mint production records for the other denominations.
    Between 1871 and 1881 a total of 17,557,941 two cent pieces, both circulation strikes and proof strikes were redeemed and melted by the mint. Unfortunately no records were kept by coin dates. This would mean that a total of 28,050,219 pieces likely survived redemption and destruction.
    Considering the previously noted estimated survival rate of proof strike two cent pieces to be sixtytwo and one percent, this would mean that of the 7,160 proof struck pieces produced, 4,475 pieces remained in circulatio

  2. PennyGuy
    There are a few key points that once learned can equip you to easily identfy the Small Motto variety of the Two Cent Piece.
    The 1864 Two Cent Piece Large vs. Small Motto
    The first year of issue for the Two Cent piece is known for a major variety. Anyone can quickly pick up the skills to easily identify the differences of the large versus small mottos. The pictures shown here are marked to help direct your examination of these coins.
    The IN GOD WE TRUST motto letters are the first indication of this variety. The small motto letters are shorter and fatter than those on the large motto coin. This author first looks at the first T and the U in TRUST, the large motto U almost reaches the lower edge of the banner while the small motto shows a clear margin between the U and the banner edge. The T resides much closer to the fold in the banner than does the large motto example.
     
    With that information in place examination can continue to confirm any given piece.
    Key differences include:
    The tips of the banner show clear differences.
    Two berries show on the lower left set of leaves on a genuine small motto.
    The large motto piece only will show one.
    The feathers on the lower end of the arrows should be checked as well. The large motto piece will display three feathers on the outside of the arrow and four on the inside. Genuine small motto coins will show three feathers on the outside and five on the inside of the left arrow. The right arrow should show four on the outside and five on the inside.
    The specialist will also point out several other differences but be assured that mastering the few key differences shown here will put you on the road to being able to "cherrypick" the two cent small motto variety.
     
    Bibliography: Flynn, Kevin; Getting your Two Cents Worth, Rancocas, NJ 08073

    To see old comments for this Journal entry, click here. New comments can be added below.
  3. PennyGuy
    With counterfeit coins flowing into the collector market, learn how to easily spot one manufacturers replica coins.
    The numismatic hobby is facing perhaps it's most threatening challenge, that of replica coins from China and other overseas locals. Low cost, and in some cases, surprisingly good quality reproductions are flooding America via a number of portals, most notably eBay.
     
    Such auctions provide a low cost outlet for the unscrupulous to market their wares. This brief study will examine the replica two cent pieces that are being sold today. A sample order was placed to allow close examination of the currently available specimens. The following pages depict the best replica, of 10 samples ordered, along with a genuine example. The follow notes will help to guide examination of these coins.
     
    Note that the counterfeit specimen shown here is not marked as a COPY or REPLICA as required by the Hobby Protection Act. When purchased the photographic sample was marked as a replica, thus the sample shown here was purchased as such. Upon delivery it was noted that the coin was not marked as required by law.
     
    Let's examine twelve key differences of a counterfeit two cent piece to an authentic piece. Please refer to the photographs below.
     
    General Observations
    1. Diameter correct at 23 mm, weight correct at 6.22 grams.
    2. Distinct ringing tone when dropped, unlike a genuine example.
    3. Obverse has very weak, mushy details.
    4. Dentils simulation not close to original spacing or shape.
    Obverse
    5. Date font is much fatter and flatter than any original coin.
    6. Numerals actually touch each other on many specimens.
    7. Surfaces display many fine scratches likely from cleaning after manufacture.
    8. Obverse device and field surfaces granular as though coin was cast.
    Reverse
    9. Reverse image details far more clear and distinct than obverse.
    10. The 7th outside leaf should be in various positions under the first T in STATES, but these replicas show that leaf far to the left of the S in STATES.
    11. The N and S of CENTS are noticeably shorter that the other letters.
    12. All dates show a full upper serif of the letter D of UNITED. Note that the both the proof and circulation strike genuine 1864 and 1865 dated coins show a full upper serif on the letter D, all other dates do not.

    To see old comments for this Journal entry, click here. New comments can be added below.