• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

PCcoins

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    1,267
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by PCcoins

  1. I've had this one since August, and tried a number of times to get a good picture of it. Well, I finally got one I'm pleased with. Here it is, a 66 * FBL

     

    IMG_9817_zpsae9bd4f6.jpg

    IMG_9796_zps44429e82.jpg

     

    NGC is so inconsistent with the star designation its almost ridiculous... Just saying that because I just sold a '58-d 50c NGC ms66FBL with no star, but had two sided monster toning that looks nicer than yours but it didn't star?

     

    Not trying to knock your coin by any means, just the whole "star" designation.

     

    Merry Christmas!!!

  2. Couldn't care less about the + or the sticker - because that's a really nice Morgan and that speaks for itself.

     

    I will have to disagree with you on this Jason, and agree with some of it. There's a group of economy submissions at pcgs, and the results were just received of 43 nice colorful to monster toned washies quarters. With only 1 coin grading ms65+ out of the bunch, with amazing toning for the date and which should have gone 66+ really.

     

    So it's a lot tougher than some believe to receive the + designation with pcgs. And yes I don't need a + or *star to tell me a nice eye appealing coin. ;)

  3. Very nice Buff's! (thumbs u

     

     

    This example has blazing golden color with fantastic luster to match. Pretty well struck for a 1913 T1 I think. :)

     

    Yep, great strike on that one. That's a keeper.

     

    Here's my most bizarre Buffalo. NGC MS-62. Guess this means the toning is natural, but I'm not so sure.

     

    1913%252520S%252520Type%2525201%252520NGC%252520MS%25252062%252520Obv.jpg

    1913%252520S%252520Type%2525201%252520NGC%252520MS%25252062%252520Rev.jpg

     

     

    I'd have to agree with you... the toning looks enhanced, or AT as they call it.

     

    But maybe it's just the image?