But some of the new sets that were added allowed me to lower (or increase) my ranking, depending how you look at it, from 65th, now to 63rd.

I gained a couple thousand points in the process and was delighted to display some coins that I've had for a while that I was never really able to show unless I took the time to create one of the Signature Sets.

For some, I had photos. For many, unfortunately, I did not. As with many of my U.S. sets, the sets are scattered, in that I dabbled a little with them, so I have pieces/parts of the collections. However, some individual coins earned me hundreds of points, even 500 or more each for a 69 grade, so no arguments from me.

I hope NGC will continue to add more sets, and I hope we will continue to tell them which sets we'd like to see added, so they know. It seems that whenever they add a set, it isn't long before a number of people create competitive sets in the category. While sometimes it's nice to be "Number One" for a time, it's also nice to know that I'm not alone collecting something, and that I didn't waste NGC's time lobbying for a particular set to be added.

They've been adding things in Australia. Personally I'd like to see more of those. Perhaps the GOLD Kangaroo, even the 1/20 oz. .9999 or various denominations (I assume it comes in larger sizes, though admittedly I am less familiar with the series than I could be), made going back to AT LEAST 1991 with some varieties like that Grey Kangaroo, the Common Wallaroo, just plain Australia Kangaroo.

Or perhaps I'd like to see something like the Australian Nugget added, a $50 gold piece that looks something like this attachment. Sorry it's small, but here in the Journals file size is limited to under 75k.