The real value of points

I have to say that I pretty much agree with "silverDollar". Even though it would hurt my standing ( way back in the peanut gallery ) There should be, in my view, a more cautious approach to awarding the points. Maybe, only allow the points to show when a collector has a mininum of 35-50% of a set. This should show that a person really is working a set, thus awarding the hard efforts of the people trying to build a set. I, myself have some "straggler" coins. Yes, I have future intentions with those coins, but that would make the points that much more valuable to the collectors, over all. I mean to say, that each individual would still be awarded their "straggler" points, it just would not show in the official standings. I have been working hard on a few sets, but I have noticed that even in NGC grading our coins so concervitively, maybe they should also award the active points just as so. Well, just my opinion, I like to talk, and maybe someone else can enlighten my opinion.