Should NGC allow ICG and ANACS on thier registry? I think so.

What about you?I like to write about what's on my mind. Wether it be on the internet, on paper, wherever. But sometimes I can't because of certain "Regulations". For example, My dad has a complete set of Kennedy Halves, and I have a coin graded by ICG of which NGC has only graded 13, but I can't seem to get them on the NGC registry Because of who the are graded by! My dad's Kennedy Half Set (#102 of 299) is only rated #102 because about a quarter of them are graded by ICG. My coin (A 1970-s Large Date ICG Pf-69DCAM Linoln Cent) could be on the registry....if it weren't graded by ICG (ICG is still above NGC on the Coin Dealer Newsletter). The point I'm trying to make ICG and ANACS should be allowed on the registry. Why shouldn't they be?!? ICG (according to the Coin Dealer Newsletter) is better than NGC - It may be by just a single precent but they're still beating them - and ANACS has a population report (Which means that cooins entered could be found). I don't know about you, but I sure think that ANACS and ICG should be permitted on the NGC registry.What about you....Do you think A.) ANACS and ICG SHOULD be permitted on the NGC registry.B.) ANACS and ICG SHOULD NOT be permitted on the NGC registry.C.) ANACS and ICG SHOULD be permitted on the NGC registry, but with limits. D.) No OpinionPlease E-mail your responce to me at Eatoncoinman@yahoo.com Or...Mail your responce to:Eaton Coin Man Jr.4677 Lebanon RdEaton, NY 13334I will Post the poll results in about 10 days.