• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Back on Top? For Now? Oh... There's Drama!

0
Revenant

528 views

So, I recently have been seeing some chatter on Facebook and elsewhere that CAC, no longer content to just deface PCGS and NGC slabs with oval stickers, is now going to be grading coins completely on their own, and putting them in slabs that look shockingly similar to PCGS slabs... I wonder how PCGS feels about that. hm

Then I come on here the other day and see the 7/24 announcement that NGC is taking away the points bonus for CAC stickered coins effective the next day. As I look on the boards, there's some chatter about NGC not being able to use the verification service anymore and its starting to look like someone - possibly someone in CAC - decided that the friendly relationship that has existed that allowed for PCGS and NGC to check the CAC stickers and award these points in a highly efficient and automated way may be over because it may not serve someone's perceived interests anymore. hm Yeah.... it's conspiratorial of me, and supposedly the functionality is coming back... but it has been down for about 1.5-2.0 months apparently, which seems interesting and suspicious, including with the timing. hm

But, for me, this change to point values has some interesting personal side effects.

Some of you may remember that about 3 years ago the 1932 set I built with my stepfather lost the top spot in the category after being on top for more than a decade:

Screenshot2023-07-25141725.thumb.png.b97573d230b8dcc112e3790c2cfe1234.png

I made a post about it at the time and otherwise mostly shrugged it off - we weren't going to spend $$$$ to defend the title on such short notice.

My stepfather, at the time, was not thrilled as you might imagine, and I got a call not long after asking - somewhat bitterly - why PCGS coins were getting more points than NGC coins in the NGC registry. It didn't make sense to him. I had to explain that it wasn't the fact that they were PCGS coins - it was the fact that they were CAC coins. I could understand his confusion though - in addition to being almost fully CAC stickered, the other set was almost completely PCGS coins where ours was almost fully NGC graded. But it was the bonus for the CAC stickers that was putting him over the top of us.

Note - they have 5 PCGS and 1 NGC to our 1 PCGS and 5 NGC coins. But they have 5 CAC stickers to our 0 and the stickers are all on the PCGS coins.

Screenshot2023-07-25141804.thumb.png.f9960c7ef5361006291b1c4bb11f362b.png

Screenshot2023-07-25141825.thumb.png.d804488f76ee6e1ffbf9ec59907beb92.png

I had actually looked into the pricing for submitting coins to CAC in the past couple of years and tried talking to my step-father because I knew getting some of our coins stickered and getting the points boost could have put us back on top, probably for just a couple hundred dollars - a lot less than trying to upgrade one of the $1,000-$4,000 coins in that set to something even more expensive. I'd been thinking if we went the upgrade route the best option was probably going to be the $10 Eagle just because bumping that from a 63 to a 64 or 65 would be easier and probably cheaper than trying to track down MS64 or MS65 D and S quarters. But, based on current pricing, upgrading the S quarter to a 64 might have been an attractive and reasonable option.

But... as of yesterday... all of those bonus points are now gone! (For now?) So, Liberty just took about a 700-point hit, and that has flipped the balance of the points back in our favor.

Screenshot2023-07-26133119.thumb.png.13b0b1d519bbcefd673254b7c2c589ce.png

So, if you want a funny... We made our set back around 2008, and we have not upgraded anything in close to 15 years now, I think, and we won for about 12 years (2008-2019).

Liberty then made their set in October 2020 - a month before the cut-off - and has not changed any of their coins out in the last 3 years, and they've won for the last 3 years. For the last 3 years we've still gotten the "best set" award based on only NGC coins because... their set barely has any NGC coins.

And now we're back on top in #1 and we may take the awards again in about 3 months - both awards possibly, NGC and overall.

In that time - we'll say 3 years, since October 2020 - nothing has changed. I guess technically my last re-imaging and presentation update might have happened in that period - I can't remember the timing on that - but neither set has been upgraded. The only thing that has changed is how points are assigned.

I'll be interested to see if this prompts some kind of response or some upgrades from Liberty to try to take the top spot back.

I haven't talked to my Stepfather about this, but I guess I'll have to give him a call soon and let him know, just for a laugh.

0



6 Comments


Recommended Comments

I don't have a dog in this fight, having no CAC coins, but I agree with removing the added points for CAC beans. NGC and PCGS are given equal points for the same coins in the same grade I believe, also fair IMO, and I wouldn't mind seeing the CACG slabbed coins being allowed in the registries and treated as equal either, when the time comes. 

The real question is, do you agree, disagree, or are indifferent with the scoring change? 

Congrats on reclaiming the top spot! :golfclap:

Link to comment
On 7/26/2023 at 4:46 PM, Fenntucky Mike said:

The real question is, do you agree, disagree, or are indifferent with the scoring change? 

Congrats on reclaiming the top spot! :golfclap:

Thanks!

I've never really agreed with them getting extra points but it's something I've never wasted much thought on. This I think is the only set that has ever been impacted by the issue just because I've been focusing on sets of coins that are hardly ever graded and for which CAC stickers just are not a thing. So it's nice to have this one back, for now. We'll see how long it sticks - 15 straight years of winning something with that set. It still kind of amazes me that it has held up so well for so long.

Link to comment

I'm happy for you that your set is back in the #1 spot, I cannot say that I'm all that excited with NGC doing away with the CAC points.   If you think about it the NGC registry system basically equates points to market values, so the bonus points were actually a reasonable adjustment to how the market values CAC approved coins.   But it's all just politics at this point.

Link to comment

First - Congrats to @Revenant!  I really enjoy reading your journals and your journey in coins, so I am glad your set it back on top.

In regard to change - All is well when two companies work in complementary business models, but the minute there is competition, all bets are off.  As a business person, I would absolutely do the same.  I would never incentivize my clients to go to a competitor, unless that was also in the best interest of my company.  

Edited by The Neophyte Numismatist
Link to comment
On 7/27/2023 at 3:51 PM, Coinbuf said:

I'm happy for you that your set is back in the #1 spot, I cannot say that I'm all that excited with NGC doing away with the CAC points.   If you think about it the NGC registry system basically equates points to market values, so the bonus points were actually a reasonable adjustment to how the market values CAC approved coins.   But it's all just politics at this point.

And I do hear you on that - 100%. It did make sense on that basis which is one of the reasons I mostly just shrugged it off - not that I think my whining would have changed it before now anyway. 🤣 But, as you say - politics.

Link to comment
On 7/27/2023 at 4:43 PM, The Neophyte Numismatist said:

First - Congrats to @Revenant!  I really enjoy reading your journals and your journey in coins, so I am glad your set it back on top.

 

Thanks! The posts are a but leaner these days because I've been busier at work and with other things lately, but maybe I'll have more to say soon if this submission gets moving.

I've wanted to get into the Argentine set more but it's hard to move on that one with no set to build in the registry and show to go.with the post and no pictures of my own.

 

Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now