• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Strike vs Lustor (easy read about classics)

4 posts in this topic

Link to Coin World article

 

By Eric von Klinger

COIN WORLD Staff

 

Sharpen your skills by reading about lustor, frosty finishes, satin and prooflike finishes on classic coins.

 

Educating...agree with author?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Luckily for collectors, luster is a key ingredient only in grading Mint State or Proof coins.

 

proof coins??? brilliant proofs for the most part if properly made have absolutely no lustre

 

other than that an excellent article that sums up to the point, the varying degrees of surfaces imparted by the dies on business strike federal coinage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only to add….according to mint documents, what is now called a “satin” surface (1909-1910 proof gold, 1921, 1922 HR, 1922 LR proof Peace dollars, and a few others) is the original surface of the new die. In addition to medal-press proofs, it would be present on the first few strikes from production dies before they acquire metal flow. Some 1921 Peace dollars made on the first day of production have a “satin” field (something many collectors dislike). This term is the same as the so-called “Roman proof.”

 

Sandblast proofs were made by literally sandblasting a “satin” proof. It was the same process for gold (1907-08, 1911-15) or silver (1921, 1922 LR proof Peace dollars, and some commemoratives).

 

Brilliant proofs require pre-production polishing of dies and often the planchets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites