My inventory skills leave alot to be desired...I just bought a duplicate

[Elbesaar]

I have been looking for a really nice proof Indian Head Cent, dated 1898 in RB for years; nothing I have found up and until now ( or so I thought ) was what I thought was suitable for inclusion in my 1898 Proof Set.

 

Tonight, I won a stunning PCGS 66 RB Proof Cent. I was thrilled !

 

When I pulled out my collection register to post my new purchase, low and behold, there on the reverse back page of my IHC collection was another 1898 Proof IHC in PCGS 65 RB which I had purchased just over a year ago from a Superior Pre-Long Beach auction.

 

As my collection is safely at the bank and its been ages since I looked at the IHC's, I completely forgot about the PR 65 RB coin !!!

 

I never downloaded the image of the PR 65 RB coin.

 

Boy - do I feel stupid !

 

[Bruceswar]

Why feel stupid... you are now the proud owner of 2 great coins congrats

[kryptonitecomics]

Yes.....my math is a bit rusty but 2 is better than 1 right?

 

 

 

[physics-fan3.14]

It's not called duplicating, it's called upgrading.

 

But if it's really bothering you, just send me the one you don't want.

[Elbesaar]

 

Yeah, I know its called upgrading, but I could have used the funds for something else.

 

Oh well.

[Jazzy]

Two is always better than one.

 

(At least that's what I've been trying to tell my girlfriend.)

[HaydenTubbs]

pics?

[EZ_E]

Someone say 1898 IHC?

 

The pix don't quite say it all, however: