I grade this Lexington MS-63. Your opinion, please?

[James_OldeTowne]

Has a couple of trivial hairlines and mild scuffs, but the luster is really nice and unimpaired. Seems quite original, too. These are pretty cheap for what you get.

 

 

James

[TomB]

It's too bad about the hairlines but I do agree that this piece seems to have substantially more luster than is typical for this issue.

[HaydenTubbs]

Nice piece James,I love that design. As for the grade,it looks accurate to me from the pictures.

 

Hayden

[Hoot]

I just love that design. One of my favorite commems.

 

Hoot

[RGT]

Here's one I sold last year. It was graded MS64 by NGC. Yours looks about as good as this one.

 

[errorist]

I would say a MS-65. But something is missing on both those Mintue Men.

[Jazzy]

I would say a MS-65. But something is missing on both those Mintue Men.

 

A diaper?

[James_OldeTowne]

Check out the other Lexington I posted here . That other one is REALLY nice, in my mind a no-brainer MS-65. The one in this thread is nice, but I just thought the hairlines would bring it down a bit. In hand, the hairlines are not nearly as prominent as appears in the image. It's just the angle at which I took the image. But side by side, comparing the two coins clearly demonstrates that one's a GEM, and the other only CHOICE.

 

THANKS for the opinions!!

 

James

[HaydenTubbs]

I would say a MS-65. But something is missing on both those Mintue Men.

 

A diaper?

 

 

HINT: PMM