New addition to type set...

[Jazzy]

I take sh*tty pictures, but you get the idea. PCGS MS 60.

 

Couple of die breaks on reverse.

 

 

[HaydenTubbs]

Nice piece,I like it.

[Jazzy]

Sorry, Mr. Tubbs, not parsing you. Did I do something wrong? The reverse was appearing in my first post. (I don't have this posting thing down yet.)

[HaydenTubbs]

Sorry, Mr. Tubbs, not parsing you. Did I do something wrong? The reverse was appearing in my first post. (I don't have this posting thing down yet.)

 

Hi there,when I first looked at your post the reverse was not showing up so I posted it on my thread.I see now that either you fixed it or my computer was misbehaving.

 

Hayden

[Jazzy]

The pic host goes weird on me sometimes for no explicable reason.

 

But thank you kindly for your helping a newbie.

[HaydenTubbs]

The pic host goes weird on me sometimes for no explicable reason.

 

But thank you kindly for your helping a newbie.

 

I know how it feels,it's irritating when you wonder why a picture isn't showing and then realize it's only because you typed JPG instead of jpg!

 

No problem, BTW.

 

 

Hayden

[TomB]

From the single set of images it looks too nice to be an MS60, why was it graded so low? Are there significant hairlines or slidemarks?

[Jazzy]

Hi TomB. Yes, I agree that it was rather conservative grading. I give it a 63, for what my opinion's worth. Perhaps it's a candidate for resubmission.

 

At any rate it replaces another piece in my collection graded by NGC at MS 60, which seems a bit too high for this one - or is it just a weak strike???

 

I like both coins, however, and I'm going to keep them. The 1866 is more of a key date, with only 3 mil minted.

 

 

[MikeInFL]

Neat coin, great civil war date!

[michael]

i love it this ms60 has to me way above average eye appeal

 

the 1865 is a sexy civil war date

 

i am truly in love with the ms60