VKurtB Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 Huge changes in packaging and coin quality. For those who cut these up for update sets, the packaging is now cardboard, and not that plastic it has been for years. The coins themselves are still in plastic “capsules”ISH things. All 20 coins are utterly flawless. These HAVE TO BE hand fed and removed from the presses without dropping down into bins. The quarters in particular are stunning, but all 20 coins might grade out 67 or even better. These are NOT your pappy’s Uncirculated Sets from the 70’s and 80’s. Henri Charriere and Hoghead515 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lem E Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 I got mine yesterday and I found no problems, but those little dimples in the plastic capsules made it look like the coins were damaged. I realized they were not and went about my day. Hoghead515 and Henri Charriere 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoghead515 Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 I may have to order a set now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
World Colonial Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 For $25.25 plus shipping, I would hope so and it's about time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Member: Seasoned Veteran DWLange Posted July 17, 2022 Member: Seasoned Veteran Share Posted July 17, 2022 Since the late 1980s the coins that go into the Uncirculated Sets have been struck solely from fresh dies that are specially treated and then discarded as soon as they begin to wear. The resulting coins have hard, faintly prooflike fields, while the ones mass produced for general circulation often reveal normal die erosion and mint luster that looks nothing like those on the set coins. When I was buying each year's Proof and Uncirculated Sets throughout the 1970s and most of the '80s I could always count on mediocre quality coins from my mail orders. The half dollars, in particular, took much abuse, as the Uncirculated Set packaging machinery placed a characteristic scrape on the chief of the shield for most examples seen. One was better off getting current coins from a bank back then. Once the Old San Francisco Mint Museum opened in 1973, with its gift shop, I could cherrypick through five or ten sets searching for unmolested halves, but that didn't happen until after the folks there got to know me. Since I performed research in the museum's superb library (where is it now?), I became a familiar figure there, and they gave me a lot of leeway after that. Sadly, the museum closed in 1994, and the building has been underutilized ever since, though there have been occasional coin shows there. Hoghead515 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VKurtB Posted July 17, 2022 Author Share Posted July 17, 2022 Of course the matte ones of 2005-2010 were obviously different. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Member: Seasoned Veteran DWLange Posted July 17, 2022 Member: Seasoned Veteran Share Posted July 17, 2022 Quote Of course the matte ones of 2005-2010 were obviously different. You're right, of course, and I forgot about those. I haven't ordered anything from the U. S. Mint since the late 1990s, though I have kept the ones I bought previously as reference pieces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henri Charriere Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 @DWLange: Do hope hope you're coming along fine. I enjoy your straight-forward dispatches. Hoghead515 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RWB Posted July 17, 2022 Share Posted July 17, 2022 the OP bought 2,022 Mint sets? Peppermint or spearmint or beemint? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Member: Seasoned Veteran DWLange Posted July 17, 2022 Member: Seasoned Veteran Share Posted July 17, 2022 Quote Do hope hope you're coming along fine. I enjoy your straight-forward dispatches. I'm managing well enough under the circumstances, but I deeply regret having to cancel my teaching gig at the ANA Seminar in June and missing all coin shows this spring and summer. I hope to be back in action for the Fall Baltimore show, but that remains to be seen. Hoghead515 and Henri Charriere 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post VKurtB Posted July 18, 2022 Author Popular Post Share Posted July 18, 2022 (edited) On 7/17/2022 at 3:34 PM, DWLange said: I'm managing well enough under the circumstances, but I deeply regret having to cancel my teaching gig at the ANA Seminar in June and missing all coin shows this spring and summer. I hope to be back in action for the Fall Baltimore show, but that remains to be seen. Anywhere Mr. Lange is supposed to be, but can’t be, is diminished. Anywhere paleonumismatic thinkers are, is also diminished. When THEY are absent, that is addition by subtraction. Changing standards is the stuff of life. Even now, through the ANA committee and subcommittee process, the standards for judging competitive exhibits are changing AGAIN, having just undergone a pretty serious change in 2018, that arguably caused more problems than it solved. The members of the subcommittee that has started the process are ANA Board Member Mark Lighterman, Donna Moon, of FUN, and me. We have reported to the Exhibiting Committee, which has made minor amendments, and the new draft standards will be discussed and debated at Rosemont next month. Edited July 18, 2022 by VKurtB Hoghead515, zadok and Henri Charriere 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henri Charriere Posted July 18, 2022 Share Posted July 18, 2022 Funny, when word gets out I am not around, it's cause for celebration! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
