Just bought a 1965 Special Mint set. 2 2

[Mr.Bill347]

You guys were right that the 1966 and 1967 SMS are terrific I don’t believe they were ever out of their boxes, fir very long at least! Thanks for suggesting I get them. Sure glad I did!

[Mohawk]

Excellent pickups, Bill!! I'm so pleased that you're happy with them.  They both look like good sets, but especially that 1967.  The quarter and the dime look really nice in your 1967 set, but I like the 1966 cent better than the 1967 one, actually.  

[J P M]

Nice sets Bill 

[Just Bob]

Before I comment on the '66 and '67 sets, I have to ask:  "Are these the sellers pics, or are they your sets?" You fooled both Kurt and me into commenting on the seller's pics of the '65 set. I'm not going to fall for that again.

[Mr.Bill347]

On 12/31/2021 at 3:22 PM, Just Bob said:

Before I comment on the '66 and '67 sets, I have to ask:  "Are these the sellers pics, or are they your sets?" You fooled both Kurt and me into commenting on the seller's pics of the '65 set. I'm not going to fall for that again.

Sorry that was totally unintentional these I received today and shot the pictures at lunch time. I wasn’t trying to ‘fool’ anyone as I posted the actual pictures of each coin in the 65 set.

[Henri Charriere]

A FLEETING THOUGHT

VKB:  NOW do you see why insist on in-person inspection..

Q.A.:  I do, sir! 

[Stackerdude21]

Wasn’t it the “Transitional” Silver-Clad thing where they had no mint marks to show the diff? After all, NGC & PCGS did NOT exist in the 1960’s.  Shucks, if they had, I’d have a truckload of graded coins. 🤣

[Mr.Bill347]

Yes please read my post on the first page which explained why these were made on old presses in the San Francisco mint with no mint marks.

OP