• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Jeff Garrett: The World's Most Valuable Coin
1 1

36 posts in this topic

These "hoards" are merely the residue of normal business transactions. There are many commercial, economic and political reasons why they were not dispersed, but almost no banker wanted to hold gold long term - it was a waste of capital. (For many the word "hoard" implies an intentional act. This is likely an incorrect assumption. Bankers, brokers and merchants make money on "inventory turn" or throughput.)

Edited by RWB
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, RWB said:

These "hoards" are merely the residue of normal business transactions. There are many commercial, economic and political reasons why they were not dispersed, but almost no banker wanted to hold gold long term - it was a waste of capital. (For many the word "hoard" implies an intentional act. This is likely an incorrect assumption. Bankers, brokers and merchants make money on "inventory turn" or throughput.

Gold was held on behalf of investors and in the private bank/wealth departments.  But a small % has always been held by banks and central banks as per BIS regulations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2021 at 11:59 AM, World Colonial said:

I read the article in Coin Week.  I'd guess most collectors who are aware of the most prominent US coinage already know the 1849 DE and J-1776 are potentially (and presumably) worth more.

I agree, until something that's known or likelier unknown, suddenly surfaces whose chain-of-custody is undisputed and cleared for sale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, GoldFinger1969 said:

The 1849 was a regularly-issued coin I believe, but J-1776 (the Liberty Head $20 DE) is a true pattern.

1849 DE is included in the Red Book.  That's how most collectors know it.  It's also listed as Judd-117 in Judd and Kosoff's "US Patterns, Trials, and Experimental Pieces".  Or is in the copy I own.

I don't know if J-1776 is in the Red Book.  It wasn't to my recollection in earlier editions, 1998 and earlier but might be wrong about that.

There are numerous patterns listed in the Red Book which in the past at least were not clearly identified as such.  This creates the false impression it's a rare or at least scarce regular mint issue which in the past affluent collectors did or might have included in their definition of a complete set.  The best example is the 1879 Flowing Hair Stella included in type sets.  It's actually a relatively common pattern with a mintage of 400.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
1 1