• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

When manufacturing coins, details are important
0

8 posts in this topic

The following letter helps illustrate how important attention to detail was when making US gold coins. Here, an excess of condemned planchets was traced to the adjusters being given files that were too coarse. critical but easily overlooked detail.

 

Pages from E-229 Box 108.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member: Seasoned Veteran

I believe it was done for gold coins alone right up to the very end. Silver coins, being already worth less than their bullion value, were simply mixed in a combination of normal, light and heavy so that the completed bag was within tolerance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All silver blanks or planchets were put through automatic sorting (the mints called these "assorting") and shaving machines. Silver dollars were among the first to have this routinely applied - largely because the volume of pieces would have overwhelmed Adjusters. All gold was checked by Adjusters in planchet form and again after striking, but before counting.

The Royal Mint used automatic sorting and shaving machines much earlier - but they had only two weights of gold coins and no "bag tolerance" like the US Mint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ugh, the typos in this letter make me cringe. 

And why are the first paragraphs double-spaced, but the last paragraph is single spaced? 

Seriously, did these folks not have an administrative assistant to make sure their letters didn't look like ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, physics-fan3.14 said:

Ugh, the typos in this letter make me cringe. 

And why are the first paragraphs double-spaced, but the last paragraph is single spaced? 

Seriously, did these folks not have an administrative assistant to make sure their letters didn't look like ? 

Much of the mint's internal correspondence was quick and casual - much like email today. There were basic standards of structure, but content was often dictated, quickly typed and presented for signature with an emphasis on getting across the ideas rather than perfect form. The Mint Bureau's tight control of certain administrative functions forced officers to write through the chain of command, and to make written notices of trivial actions - such as purchasing metal files for the Adjusters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always enjoy the self-deprecating language in these old letters. "I beg to enclose", "very respectfully", "your humble servant" type stuff. If only Twitter were like that today...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
0