• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Small Capped Quarters

4 posts in this topic

A question for the experts.

 

I'm not sure of the exact term - die rotation?

 

Is it common for coins of this type to have the reverse rotated off the normal 180 deg from the obverse?

 

Thanks in advance,

Joel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Joel,

 

Die rotation of some few degress is common and to be expected on most coins. But a rotation of 180 degrees is so unusual as to warrant a premium for collectors who enjoy varieties and errors. Premiums are associated with coins of 90 degree rotation as well. The exception would be a few coins that are known to have many examples with rotated dies, such as the 1864 two-cent, 1864 Indian cent, and 1805 half-cent. For those, little premium, if any, would apply.

 

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think James and I are reading your post slightly differently. You are asking if a die rotation of something other than 180 degrees is common, and you are not saying that you have a coin with a die rotation that is 180 degrees off, correct?

 

If you are asking about die rotations other than 180 degrees, then I would say that they are common. The US Mint had at one time established a tolerance of 15 degrees in either direction, I believe, for die rotation. Many of these early pieces are slightly skewed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tom,

 

You are correct, however, I was able to discern the correct answer from James' post.

 

In my initial post, I was afraid that the answer given would explain the normal obverse/reverse relationship. Now I see that explaining a die rotation is noted as the number of degrees out of "normal."

 

The coin in question is ~30-45 deg rotated. I beleive that would be the correct description, no?

 

Thanks guys,

Joel

Link to comment
Share on other sites