Is this getting old yet? 2 more, guess what.

[clarkbar04]

Both are blazers, the 44-S looks like the pearly sheen you'd see in an abalone shell. The fields on it are impressive. The 1934 has a bit different luster as the dies were heavily adjusted/polished as evidenced by the many lines.

 

 

Lil eye candy, finally had to buy a graded one. (sellers photos) The sun looks so happy to be on that coin!

 

[Tyler N.]

I want to know where you're getting these Walkers. They all look like great coins!

 

1934: MS66+

1944-S: MS66

[Walkerfan]

I want to know where you're getting these Walkers. They all look like great coins!

 

+1

 

You just can't find them like that, in the wild, anymore.

 

66

 

65

[clarkbar04]

The 44-S was in a really old Littleton Coin Company hand typed flip marked "MS-63, CH UNC $295"

 

Was there ever a time a "63" 44-S was worth that much?

 

I promise I'm going to have some of these sent off soon to post grade results, in fact, hoping to send a batch of 8 off next week.

[KMAG100]

My thought is a pair of 65s...the fields on the first have the look of a 66, but I can't get past the cheek on her....so I'm calling it a 65...probably unfairly. Great coins.

[clarkbar04]

These 2 are off for grading, as well as a 1916-D, 1916-S, 1936-D, 1936-S, 1939-S, and 1935. I think I've posted them all here except the 36-S, it has a ton of luster and is struck very well.

 

[clarkbar04]

Grades in today, strangely enough just one day after regular results.

 

I got a 65 on the 44-S and the 34 got a 62. There were 2 heavier lines buried in what I thought was an entire field of die polish lines but perhaps the graders deemed these as very faint scratches. It was so hard to tell I dismissed them as DPLs.