Is this undergraded?

[JIM F.]

 

[bsshog40]

Using pic you presented Jim, 62 looks good to me. Looks like a lot of chatter in the fields. I would have actually guessed at 61-62.

[copper toning]

I would have to agree with Bobby. Looks to have a lot going on.

[Coindude]

It doesn't look as bad as some 62's I've seen but the mirrors are going to accentuate any and all flaws and that's what makes it look worse than it probably really is.

[coinman_23885]

No.

[joes2001]

It's really hard to tell from that pic. I would have to examine it under light, turn it, etc. Like someone else said, the mirror fields do emphasize flaws a lot more than normal.

[physics-fan3.14]

Impossible to tell from that pic.

[brg5658]

Impossible to tell from that pic.

 

+1

 

 

[cpm9ball]

It doesn't look as bad as some 62's I've seen but the mirrors are going to accentuate any and all flaws and that's what makes it look worse than it probably really is.

 

(thumbs u

 

Chris

[jpcienkus]

Impossible to tell from that pic.

 

+2

 

 

[jom]

Impossible to tell from that pic.

 

+62

 

jom

[Kurtdog]

It doesn't look as bad as some 62's I've seen but the mirrors are going to accentuate any and all flaws and that's what makes it look worse than it probably really is.

(thumbs u

 

Chris

(thumbs u

 

[mkman123]

the picture could be enhanced making it look much frostier than it is!

[johnny9434]

it looks to be right in line by the pics. im not totally sure thou.