• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Not-So-Safe-Deposit Boxes: States Seize Citizens' Property to Balance Budget

16 posts in this topic

original link

 

safetydepositbox.jpg

 

 

Not-So-Safe-Deposit Boxes: States Seize Citizens' Property to Balance Their Budgets

Resources to Search for Unclaimed Property in Your Name

By ELISABETH LEAMY - May 12, 2008

 

 

The 50 U.S. states are holding more than $32 billion worth of unclaimed property that they're supposed to safeguard for their citizens. But a "Good Morning America" investigation found some states aggressively seize property that isn't really unclaimed and then use the money -- your money -- to balance their budgets.

 

Unclaimed property consists of things like forgotten apartment security deposits, uncashed dividend checks and safe-deposit boxes abandoned when an elderly relative dies.

 

Banks and other businesses are required to turn that property over to the state for safekeeping. The problem is that the states return less than a quarter of unclaimed property to the rightful owners.

 

Not-So-Safe-Deposit Boxes

 

San Francisco resident Carla Ruff's safe-deposit box was drilled, seized, and turned over to the state of California, marked "owner unknown."

 

"I was appalled," Ruff said. "I felt violated."

 

Unknown? Carla's name was right on documents in the box at the Noe Valley Bank of America location. So was her address -- a house about six blocks from the bank. Carla had a checking account at the bank, too -- still does -- and receives regular statements. Plus, she has receipts showing she's the kind of person who paid her box rental fee. And yet, she says nobody ever notified her.

 

"They are zealously uncovering accounts that are not unclaimed," Ruff said.

 

To make matters worse, Ruff discovered the loss when she went to her box to retrieve important paperwork she needed because her husband was dying. Those papers had been shredded.

 

And that's not all. Her great-grandmother's precious natural pearls and other jewelry had been auctioned off. They were sold for just $1,800, even though they were appraised for $82,500.

 

"These things were things that she gave to me," Ruff said. "I valued them because I loved her."

 

Bank of America told ABC News it deeply regrets the situation and appreciates the difficulty of what Mrs. Ruff was going through. The bank has reached a settlement with Ruff and continues to update its unclaimed property procedures as laws change.

 

California's Class Action Lawsuit

 

Ruff is not alone. Attorney Bill Palmer represents her and countless other citizens in a class action lawsuit against the state of California.

 

"They figured the safety-deposit box was safer than keeping it under the mattress," Palmer said. "In the case of a lot of citizens, they were wrong, weren't they?"

 

California law used to say property was unclaimed if the rightful owner had had no contact with the business for 15 years. But during various state budget crises, the waiting period was reduced to seven years, and then five, and then three. Legislators even tried for one year. Why? Because the state wanted to use that free money.

 

"That's absolutely correct," said California State Controller John Chiang, who inherited the situation when he came into office. "What we've done here over the last two decades has been dead wrong. We've kept the property and not provided owners with the opportunities -- the best opportunities -- to get their property back."

 

Chiang now faces the daunting task of returning $5.1 billion worth of unclaimed property to people. Some states keep their unclaimed property in a special trust fund and only tap into the interest they earn on it. But California dumps the money into the general fund -- and spends it.

 

"It's supposed to be segregated and protected," Palmer said. "California has taken all of that $5.1 billion and has used it as a massive loan."

 

California became so addicted to spending people's money, that, for years, it simply stopped sending notices to the rightful owners. ABC News obtained a 1996 internal memo in which the lawyer for the Bureau of Unclaimed Property argued against expanding programs to notify rightful owners. He wrote, "It could well result in additional claims of monies that would otherwise flow into the general fund."

 

Seizing More Than Safe-Deposit Boxes

 

It's not just safe-deposit boxes. A British man went to retire and discovered the $4 million in U.S. stock he had been counting on had been seized and sold for $200,000 years earlier -- even though he was in touch with the company about other matters.

 

A Sacramento family lost out on railroad land rights their ancestors had owned for generations -- also sold off as unclaimed property.

 

"If I had hung onto it, I would be a millionaire, multimillionaire," said John Whitley. "But that didn't happen because we didn't get to hold it."

 

State Reforms

 

California's unclaimed property program was so out of control that, last year, the courts issued injunctions barring the state from seizing any more property until it made reforms. Since then, Chiang has taken several steps to try to clean up the program.

 

For example, the state now sends notices alerting citizens about unclaimed property before it is handed over to the state -- the only state to do so. Once unclaimed property is delivered to the state, it is now held for several months while the state tries to contact the owners, rather than it being immediately sold off or destroyed.

 

Which raises the question, in the Internet era, is anybody really lost anymore? California and other states are just beginning to make use of modern databases that can find most anyone in minutes. Unfortunately, California only uses those databases to search after it has already seized a citizen's property.

 

If California does get better at locating people, that could present another challenge. Remember, right now, the state spends the money.

 

"It's like the last guy in line at a pizza parlor," Palmer criticized. "There is only so much pizza. At the end, when I get up to the counter to claim my pizza, there may be no pizza for me."

 

California's fiscal problems are legendary and once again in the news, so it's reasonable to question whether the state can afford to repay its citizens if a bunch of them surface at once.

 

"There is always going to be money to give the owners when they make their claim, " Chiang insisted. "I don't want my legacy to say I continued a broken program. I want my legacy to be 'this guy was the guy who truly cared about the people and returned their money.'"

 

California is not the only state to come under fire for its handling of unclaimed property. In Delaware, unclaimed property is the third largest source of state revenue. Idaho recently passed an unprecedented law that says the state gets to keep unclaimed property permanently if the rightful owners don't claim it within 10 short years. And all 50 states pay private contractors 10 to 12 percent commissions to locate and seize accounts for them. It's an inherent conflict of interest: the more rightful owners are found, the less money the contractors make.

 

Of course, there are some states who handle their people's property with respect. Oregon never takes title to unclaimed property. Instead, it holds it in a perpetual trust fund.

 

Colorado uses the interest on its unclaimed property fund to pay for some state programs, but leaves the principal untouched.

 

Missouri, Iowa and Kansas make extra efforts to reunite people with their property –even setting up booths at state fairs to get the word out. The State of Maryland actively compares the names on unclaimed accounts with state income tax records. If it finds a match, the state simply cuts a check and sends it to the citizen.

 

Protecting Your Property

 

So, the question for citizens is, how do you protect yourself?

 

Make contact with your bank, your brokerage firm, etc. at least once a year, in a way that creates a paper trail. Make sure they have your current address.

If you own stock, occasionally vote your proxies or take other steps to keep your stock ownership active. Stay in touch with your broker.

Write a list of all your accounts and keep it with your will, so your heirs will know where to look.

Consider insuring valuables even if you keep them in your safe-deposit box. That way, you're covered financially if the bank or state makes a mistake and empties your box. Plus, safe-deposit contents have been known to be destroyed by fire or flooding.

If you want to search for unclaimed property in your name, you do not need to pay other people to do it for you. Check out the following links for more information:

 

National Association of Unclaimed Property Administrators

 

www.missingmoney.com

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found that WA owes me $50 from when I was stationed there in the navy 20 years ago. :insane:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOW....that why I don't keep anything in a safe deposit box.

It would be in your better interest to just buy a safe for your house!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i keep stuff in box. while most the expensive stuff is in my safe, and insured. i also take a photo of my box when i visit and /or take something out. there is also a peiece of paper that gets signed everytime i visit. which makes the bank person sign to what is in box at time of closing it again.

this is horable to hear and hope that the people get there money back from our gov.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was watching an auction a few weeks ago in Oklahoma.

People were claiming their property all the way up to the auction.

It's just not right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing that they can do that. Fortunately I moved everything from my Safety Deposit Boxes to new ones a few months back with the exception of my US Mint Sets and some miscellaneous coins which were "seized" by my soon to be ex in an effort to "balance her budget" so to speak. Good new is they will be returned at some point. Now I may re-think the entire Box scenario, not safe from Uncle Sam or the other half!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Rey

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It sounds as though the State of California has found a unique twist for perhaps using the Patriot Act to seize private property in safety deposit boxes. I would not be surprised if that is their defense in the class action suits which are pending against them. California always has also been overzealous about twisting and collecting their unique view of "taxes due" by any means that they can justify.

 

The California Tax Franchise Board tried to tax my brokerage account proceeds for the partial year that I lived in Utah, prior to moving back to California. I had (2) 1099-X's for that year, California just tried using the higher number, not the CA-1099-X as a basis for auditing and demanding more money from me in state taxes. It cost me more for a CPA to straighten the state out than I would have paid in extra taxes, but it was worth it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, this is another example of the erosion of private private property rights in this country. I read that article yesterday on an economic blog.

 

I happen to have a couple of safe deposit boxes because I have no other choice unless I do not want to have a collection of any value. My residence is in a safe area of town but I would not keep valuables worth this much in it.

 

This example is not the first one and it will not be the last. I cannot remember the specifics, but I recall that in 2002 or 2003 one or more states (including Alabama I believe) refused to issue state income tax refunds. I'm not sure if this is actually true and even if it was, there are ways around that but do not be surprised if this type of gets worse as the economy deteriorates. The spineless populist demagogues "we" have elected do not have the guts to tell the incurable romantic and clueless voters that they cannot have what they want.

 

If it were practical, I would consider sending my coins offshore to a jurisdiction that actually does respect property rights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's why I go into my boxes several times a month! I never knew the reason, but now I do, and if that ever happened to me, someone would be paying big time, not just in cash but in the reputation of that particular bank in the local community (which is much more important in rural areas!). But in a way, none of this is surprising as every government from your town council to the Feds are all looking for new ways to get their hands in your pockets, it's been that way ever since governments were instituted by man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Amazing that they can do that. Fortunately I moved everything from my Safety Deposit Boxes to new ones a few months back with the exception of my US Mint Sets and some miscellaneous coins which were "seized" by my soon to be ex in an effort to "balance her budget" so to speak. Good new is they will be returned at some point. Now I may re-think the entire Box scenario, not safe from Uncle Sam or the other half!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Rey

 

Rey, did you ever find out if your ex "seized" that railroad medal I sent you?

 

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, this is why I keep all of my coins under lock and key in my house. I have a key and my parents do, and I would never believe that they would do anything to my collection.

 

Texas is a community property state so my mother keeps telling me that if I ever get married I need to take steps to make sure that my pre-marriage collection is not lumped in with marrital assets in the event of a divorce.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

While this news story is pretty horrible, and I originally read it perhaps a month ago, it does not convince me that I am better off leaving my coins at home vs. safe deposit boxes. Additionally, not only do I not live in CA, but I also go to my boxes several times each week, which likely further reduces the chance of these events.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When a state like California has so many social programs, many of them passed by citizens as part of propositions, you get a government that looks for overzealous ways to collect the money to support those programs. States like Delaware did themselves in by creating business friendly laws that prevent all those Delaware registered states from paying any taxes.

 

Although Maryland, where I live, has laws that require that the bank document how they try to contact me, there are cases where the documentation is either lacking or have been falsified. I go to my safe deposit boxes every three months, whether I need to or not.

 

Now... if I can figure out how to tell the State of New York that I lived on Long Island at 13 and I am that person who the bond is made out to so I can claim it from their unclaimed assets division, I could have a few more dollars to buy coins! :)

 

Scott :hi:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When a state like California has so many social programs, many of them passed by citizens as part of propositions, you get a government that looks for overzealous ways to collect the money to support those programs. States like Delaware did themselves in by creating business friendly laws that prevent all those Delaware registered states from paying any taxes.

 

Although Maryland, where I live, has laws that require that the bank document how they try to contact me, there are cases where the documentation is either lacking or have been falsified. I go to my safe deposit boxes every three months, whether I need to or not.

 

Now... if I can figure out how to tell the State of New York that I lived on Long Island at 13 and I am that person who the bond is made out to so I can claim it from their unclaimed assets division, I could have a few more dollars to buy coins! :)

 

Scott :hi:

 

California is not new at this I was stationed in California in the 70s. When I was transferred to Florida I received a letter from the State telling me that I owed State Income tax because I had been stationed in California .My State of Record was Texas which has no State Income Tax and neither does Florida. I had to go to Legal to get it straightened out. Apparently California kept doing it because a few later the U,S, Navy had to sue them because of the fact that States are based on your State of Record and not the fact that you might have to establish temporary residence while stationed there. Apparently there were others but California was the worst and I am sure the other States tried to take their cue form California.

Link to comment
Share on other sites