Luv dat ANACS

[Count_Erfit]

PF63 and glistening from 3 tables away.

 

 

 

a......few.........hairlines.

[Wihlborg]

Very nice coin

 

John

[nwcs]

Looks great in the picture. What makes the grade a 63?

[airplanenut]

Looks great in the picture. What makes the grade a 63?

He said hairlines

[chrisfuccione]

Cool!

[nwcs]

Looks great in the picture. What makes the grade a 63?

He said hairlines

Ahh, I didn't look below the pic.

[Count_Erfit]

The hairlines are far too few for a 63. MINUTE lil ones. looks more 64 technically, but the eye appeal is better'n a LOT of 65's and 66's I have seen.

 

I would consider it a misgrade. However I did not argue price because slabs do not lie.

 

[proofs03-migration]

Is any of the luster gone? This is a very fine coin that in the picture should have made 65. All area's look like they would show original luster. I see no wear, and the lines, well that could have come from the graders loupe. Well you got a excellent coin. I do however disagree with 63. To say that the coin would need to be 100 times better to make 64, and then 100 times greater than 64 to make 65; I just don't see it. Well I guess that is why I don't own NGC or PCGS, but I would still grade it 65 if it looked this good in person as it does in the photo.

 

Steve

[chinook]

I would rather have a nice clean looking proof with a few hairlines and booming luster than an example in the same grade with subdued luster or splotchy toning.

 

Great find!

[Cam41-migration]

Sweet!!!!!!!

 

Picture looks nicer than what the grade is. 63?

 

Those hairline scratches sure are well hidden.

[Hoot]

Exquisite coin Count! For some reason the proof seated coins are generally more appealing to me than the MS. (But I've seen some of EVP's that can knock your socks off!)

 

Hoot