• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

J P M

Member: Seasoned Veteran
  • Posts

    4,259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    28

Posts posted by J P M

  1. Who is to say, Your coin may be a proof they still made Proof sets in 1964.

    33 minutes ago, Moxie15 said:

    You can't. Even the experts who say that they can tell cannot give an explanation on how to tell. Other experts say they do not exist. In reality Special Mint Set is a misnomer as there were no sets ever made. Some experts say that the coin are merely first strikes on new dies that were kept aside.

    Here is a 1965 set .The paperwork says it is a special mint set from the San Francisco mint. 

    1965 SMS.jpg

  2. 7 hours ago, Coinbuf said:

    You do realize that the person you tagged made one post back in 2011 and it does not look like he has been back since.  So the chances of him answering your post seem very slim.

    LoLs funny I did not see that. I saw the thread come up and thought it was new.9_9

    And yes they are nice  RWB but too much hoopla with the book and all. There asking $60 for it , I may offer them $40 not sure if it will be worth a lot down the road.

    3 hours ago, RWB said:

    They are nice medals, although lacking in finesse.

  3. 2 hours ago, KarenHolcomb said:

    you might want to consider moving away from Proof Sets and get you some Uncirculated Sets. That's where the money is. 

    I am wondering why you say there is more profit in mint sets rather than proof sets? Unless you are breaking up the sets and selling them off piece by piece.:whistle:  I agree that Proof sets do not go up in value much over time. but when I pay $5 to $8 on average it is not a big loss but the quality of a mint set is quite poor. I find most of the time they look like leftover coins from the floor of the mint that have been swept up and put in a plastic wrappers.:roflmao:

  4. 31 minutes ago, Quintus Arrius said:

    My uninformed guess is the coin was lightly spritzed with silver paint dispensed from an aerosol can or atomizer. No big deal.  In fact, if the silver were real, its application may have increased the value of this expensive-to-produce, intrinsically worthless cent.

    I thought so also Quintus but in reality after further investigation it is the zinc your seeing the copper is really that thin that it rubs off .LoL. Hard to believe.

  5. Look at this it is like the copper was worn off. I was not sure if it was grease or what, it was kinda sticky so I washed it off now it is ruined another experiment gone wrong in someone's laboratory somewhere. Poor Abe is always getting abused.

    S20210611_0001.jpg

    S20210611_0002.jpg

  6. 1 hour ago, Woods020 said:

    The wide rim coins are only in 79. They switched to this design in 80 and forward. So it’s only rare on a 79. With that said even a wide rim 79 isn’t “big money”. In MS65 I think they are around $30-$40. Circulated like the one posted, even if it was a wide rim which it isn’t, would not be worth more than a few dollars probably. 

    Sorry I posted that one because it has the rare S I believe these 2 are narrow rim

    S20210607_0003.jpg

    S20210607_0004.jpg