• When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

Oregon_Kevin

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1.    Ali E. reacted to a post in a topic: Need a new NGC Registry set? **Please remember to include your NGC certification numbers in your request! **
  2. Oregon_Kevin
    Thank you for the reply, Ali. I totally understand and glad to know the custom set functionality is being considered for some improvements!
  3. Oregon_Kevin
    I would recommend the following type/design sets with cutoffs to exclude modern, these could include and exclude gold. I do want to add, I believe the coins included in these proposed sets have ample representation in other sets, but those sets are more cumbersome if you don't collect modern coins. Basic Design Set Complete 1792-1964 (Not a type set, but a design set, IE one liberty seated per denomination) Basic Design Set 19th Cen. 1800-1899 (Not a type set, but a design set, IE one liberty seated per denomination) Basic Design Set 20th Cen. 1900-1964 (Not a type set, but a design set, IE one Lincoln cent per denomination) Basic Type Set 20th Cen. 1900-1964 The other idea I was thinking of was instead of denormalizing the list to have with and without modern, maybe the coin ID's could all be tagged and a user filter could be applied which excludes the modern coins across the board. Maybe this could be added to gold as well. You could keep the awards to everything, but offer a ranking system for collectors without modern as I like the actual registry much better than the custom set process and output. Thanks!!