0
  • entries
    28
  • comments
    0
  • views
    438

Entries in this journal

The trouble with ICG is ...

... its lack of transparency to collectors. The same can be said of ANACS. Both ICG and ANACS are good TPGs but they need to work on their relationship with collectors in order to garner any respect. I for one have been very disillusioned with ICG as I had lamented in my last post "To cross or not to cross..." ICG needs work on its web site, make it more interactive and informative to collectors. And most importantly, make available a population report, coin certification lookup, etc., to

FuzzyChaos

FuzzyChaos

To cross or not to cross.

Oh! Those pre-registry days, and I was swept away by the turbulence that ICG had brought to the calm seas of TPGs. It was the time before registry sets, long long ago, that ICG came into the TPG scene, with their promise of independent and fair grading. I was swept away by the storm ICG had brought to the calm of TPG seas. So I ended up acquiring a lot of high grade ICG coins. But today, I am dissappointed by their lack of transparency. No population report, no registry. I still hear some

FuzzyChaos

FuzzyChaos

Support Group? Point me to it... Not here!

Severe case of IGHIN here. This site has only been fueling my desires. I am afflicted too. Focus! You said. How is it done? I haven't found this site to be much help. Coin talk just fuels my desires and seeing high grade coins (especially moderns) give me a severe case of IGHIN. We really need to get this affliction certified, perhaps by AMA or better yet, PCGS ;-) and then research therapeutic remedies. Have a great day!

FuzzyChaos

FuzzyChaos

0